»
 
 
»
»
»
Tag Cloud



Thank you to our contest sponsors:

Avon Foundation for Women

Nooka

Alliance Blog

Blog Contest
"A Day in the Life of ... a Rape Crisis Advocate" Blog Contest

Thank you to the advocates who submitted a blog post. We chose 6 finalists, and will feature a new story each week.

We hope you enjoy reading about the fascinating experiences of these rape crisis advocates!

Week 1: Laura, from the Mt Sinai Sexual Assault and Violence Intervention Program

Week 2: Vicki, from The Awareness Center

Week 3: Ihotu, from the Crime Victims Treatment Center

Week 4: Meredith, from Beth Israel Medical Center Rape Crisis and Domestic Violence Intervention Program

Week 5: Kristin, from Mt Sinai Sexual Assault and Violence Intervention (SAVI) Program


[Contest rules]

Change.org top 10–includes 2 sexual violence victories!

December 31, 2009, 3:02 pm — Saskia (Uncategorized)

Every year Change.org creates a top 10 list of things members helped accomplish over the past year.

This year we were pretty excited to see sexual violence topics take up 2 places on this list.

Coming in @ #9, they listed:

9. Chicago Tribune Columnist Apologizes for Blaming Rape Victim
Just last month a nationally syndicated female advice columnist responded to a young woman who was raped at a fraternity party and asking advice by writing: “Were you a victim? Yes…you were a victim of your own awful judgment.” This sort of outrageous victim blaming is one of the reasons why the majority of rapes go unreported, and in response Change.org members and bloggers across the web sent 5000 letters in protest to columnist Amy Dickenson and the Chicago Tribune, forcing Ms. Dickenson to respond publicly, apologize for the statement, and make it clear that she did not mean to blame the victim. Although we’d like Amy and the Chicago Tribune to go much further in addressing the issue, the Change.org community sent a clear message that victim blaming by the media will no longer go unaddressed.

I was particularly excited to see this issue make the list, as victim blaming does often go unnoticed or unaddressed. Sexual violence is so pervasive, that we sometimes forget that simply pointing out the dangerous biases of others is an important way to combat this problem. Good job  change.org for mobilizing supporters, and for highlighting this important issue!

Change.org also included this @ #10:

10. Choice Hotels Commits to Enhance Preventative Human Trafficking Measures
One of the tragic stories we reported on this fall was that of five-year-old Shaniya Davis, who was sold for sex in a Comfort Inn in North Carolina shortly before her body was found on the side of the road. Comfort Inn is owned by the hotel conglomerate Choice Hotels, which has avoided signing a widely embraced code of conduct administered by the international organization ECPAT and funded by UNICEF to prevent child prostitution in the travel industry. After we wrote about the story we got in touch with ECPAT and launched a campaign demanding that Choice Hotels embrace the code of conduct, leading thousands of Change.org activists to send messages to Choice Hotels’ CEO within days of the article. Although initially resistant, Choice Hotels eventually agreed to have a conversation with ECPAT and is now committed to taking further steps to ensure its hotels aren’t again used for child prostitution.

I had not actually heard about this campaign before reading their list, but I’m really happy to hear that domestic trafficking work is gaining some momentum. Perhaps I’ll find out a little more information about this particular incident and blog about it in the new year.

When dealing with sexual violence it can sometimes be hard to be positive–so I think it’s great to see a national organization touting their good work in this area!

Maybe the Alliance can come up with their own top 10 list in 2010!

The ($) cost of physical and sexual abuse

December 24, 2009, 1:42 pm — Saskia (Uncategorized)

With universal healthcare (maybe? probably? hopefully?) looming on the horizon, I thought this recent journal article about the impact of childhood abuse upon later medical costs was timely and interesting.

According to a study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine, health care costs are significantly greater for women who were physically or sexually abused as children than for women who left childhood unscathed.

    The authors found that health care costs for women with a history of physical and sexual abuse averaged $3,203 annually, while costs for women who were not abused averaged $2,413.

    This is  almost $800 difference.

    They also found that: “Women who endured both types of abuse also used more mental health, hospital outpatient, emergency department, primary care, specialty care, and pharmacy services than the nonabused group.”

    Seems like the message is pretty clear:

    Childhood sexual abuse can have a lasting and complex impact.

    Something to think about in terms of prevention and service delivery for all children in NYC.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Bonomi, Anderson, Rivara, et al., “Health care utilization and costs associated with childhood abuse,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(3):249-299, 2008 (AHRQ grant HS10909)

    Military Academies Report Sexual Assaults Down..?

    December 22, 2009, 10:00 am — Saskia (Uncategorized)

    Sometimes I wish New York Times headline writers were a little bit snarkier.

    (Snark=combination of “snide” and “remark”).

    The restaurant reviewers and movie columnists have the style down pat. The headline writers, however, seem to believe that being overly serious or incredibly inflammatory are the only options.

    For example, the headline for a recent piece on sexual assault in the military:

    “Reported Sex Assaults Down at Military Academies”
    Really?

    That’s a pretty interesting title, considering the first sentence of the article actually says that:  “The number of reported sexual assaults has dropped again at the nation’s three major military academies, the Defense Department said Friday, noting that underreporting could be a reason for the decrease.”   (emphasis mine)

    So what they really mean is that while the overall numbers have gone down, it’s very likely that the decrease reflects the change in the survey method–which they recently revamped and is no longer anonymous.

    Sounds like a pretty dubious conclusion to me.

    Sexual assault is notoriously underreported in the general population. It’s even higher in the military (the article cites that it could be as high as 90%).

    I’m not sure that high underreporting rate+ a new system that removes the option for anonymity= accurate data.

    While I’m glad that  military academies are trying address the problem of sexual assault through new programs, I’d really like to see a little more data before concluding that they have made real progress.

    I think the NYTimes should consider this too before throwing a party for the academies with a potentially misleading headline.

    Older Posts »

    Blog posts are the responsibility of their authors, and do not reflect the opinions of the New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault.

    rss icon